The journey toward diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the United States has been shaped by pivotal moments in history that connect legal mandates, corporate strategies, and social movements. This timeline highlights the evolution of DEI from its legal foundations in the 1960s to its contemporary focus on innovation and resilience in the face of legislative and societal hostility. The timeline that follows traces key legal, social, and corporate milestones from the 1940s to the present, highlighting how DEI efforts have evolved and adapted despite persistent challenges. By learning from this history, organizations and advocates can build stronger, more resilient DEI strategies that drive meaningful and lasting progress in workplaces and society.
The 1940s and 1950s were pivotal in establishing the early legal and social frameworks that would shape modern Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts. As World War II and the post-war era heightened demands for civil rights, government policies and grassroots activism played a critical role in challenging workplace and societal discrimination.
● 1941: A. Philip Randolph’s March on Washington Movement (MOWM) pressured President Franklin D. Roosevelt to issue Executive Order 8802, banning racial discrimination in defense industries and federal employment.
● 1948: Executive Order 9981, signed by President Harry S. Truman, desegregated the U.S. military, mandating “equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion, or national origin.”
● 1954: Brown v. Board of Education ruled racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
● 1955–1956: The Montgomery Bus Boycott, led by Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr., protested racial segregation in public transportation.
● 1957: The Civil Rights Act of 1957 established the Civil Rights Division within the Department of Justice and empowered federal oversight of voter rights.
These policies and movements marked the federal government’s first major interventions against systemic discrimination, setting legal precedents for workplace integration and civil rights protections. By addressing racial segregation in employment, public services, and voting rights, they laid the foundation for future DEI efforts, proving that both legislative action and grassroots activism were essential in advancing equity.
The 1950s and 1960s saw groundbreaking advancements in civil rights and workplace equity, but these efforts were met with fierce resistance. While policies like affirmative action, Title VII, and Medicare-driven hospital desegregation sought to dismantle systemic discrimination, white supremacist organizations, corporate pushback, and political obstruction worked to undermine these changes.
● 1954: Brown v. Board of Education ruled racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, setting a precedent for workplace and institutional desegregation.
● 1961: Executive Order 10925, signed by President Kennedy, introduced “affirmative action,” requiring federal contractors to ensure that applicants and employees are treated “without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin” and created the President’s Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity.
● 1963: The Equal Pay Act prohibited gender-based wage discrimination, laying the groundwork for pay equity.
● 1964: The Civil Rights Act (Title VII) banned discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, making workplace equity a legal imperative.
● 1965: Executive Order 11246, signed by President Johnson, mandated affirmative action for federal contractors, embedding DEI principles in government operations.
● 1965: The first Corporate Employee Resource Group (ERG) at Xerox was established by Black employees to advocate for pay equity and an inclusive corporate environment.
● 1965: Medicare enforced hospital desegregation by denying federal funding to noncompliant hospitals, ensuring equal medical access for Black patients.
● 1965: Civil rights organizations (NAACP, SCLC, etc.) pressured the federal government to enforce desegregation in healthcare and employment.
● 1968: The Kerner Commission Report concluded that systemic racism and economic inequities fueled civil unrest, calling for affirmative action and racial equity programs.
● 1968: Xerox Memo on Affirmative Action formally committed the company to DEI, making Xerox one of the first major corporations to take a public stand.
● White Citizens’ Councils (1950s–1960s): Known as the “uptown Klan,” these white supremacist groups used economic intimidation, legal challenges, and political lobbying to block integration and maintain white dominance in workplaces and schools.
● Southern Democrats (“Dixiecrats”): Fought civil rights laws under the banner of “states’ rights,” advocating policies that upheld segregation and economic exclusion of Black communities.
● Massive Resistance Campaign (1956–1960s): Southern lawmakers and local
governments coordinated efforts to resist Brown v. Board of Education, shutting down schools, denying funding, and passing laws to obstruct integration.
● Corporate Resistance to Affirmative Action (1960s): Many businesses refused to comply with federal anti-discrimination laws, challenging affirmative action mandates and excluding Black workers from promotions and high-paying jobs.
● 1964: Barry Goldwater’s Opposition to the Civil Rights Act: As a presidential candidate, Goldwater framed the Civil Rights Act as government overreach, helping shift the Republican Party toward an anti-civil rights platform that influenced future opposition to DEI.
● 1968: “Law and Order” Rhetoric Begins: Politicians, including Richard Nixon, used coded language to oppose civil rights gains, portraying Black activism as a threat and justifying policies that criminalized communities of color.
The legal and policy advancements of the 1950s and 1960s established crucial protections for racial equity, yet opposition from white supremacist groups, corporate defiance, and political obstructionism slowed progress. This period underscores the ongoing need for vigilance and advocacy, as the same forces that resisted civil rights laws continue to challenge DEI efforts today.
The 1970s and 1980s saw DEI evolve from legal compliance to a recognized business advantage, as workplace protections expanded, and demographic shifts signaled the economic benefits of diversity. However, this period also saw significant pushback, with the escalation of the War on Drugs, tough-on-crime policies, and legal challenges to affirmative action disproportionately harming Black and Brown communities and undermining civil rights progress.
● 1971: Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Supreme Court decision established the “disparate impact” doctrine, demonstrating that race-neutral policies could still violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act if they disproportionately affected underrepresented groups.
● 1972: The Equal Employment Opportunity Act expanded the enforcement power of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), laying the foundation for early DEI practitioners who initially focused on compliance but later shifted toward employee retention and workplace inclusion strategies.
● 1978: Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke ruled that addressing past racism is a compelling state interest but banned strict racial quotas in college admissions, weakening affirmative action efforts.
● 1987: The Workforce 2000 report by the Hudson Institute projected major demographic shifts in the U.S. workforce, emphasizing the economic benefits of diversity and urging businesses to prepare for an increasingly multicultural labor pool.
● 1982: Reagan’s War on Drugs Campaign initiated harsh drug policies that disproportionately targeted Black and Brown communities, framing drug use as a criminal issue rather than a public health crisis.
● 1984: Comprehensive Crime Control Act expanded federal penalties for drug offenses and violent crimes, accelerating mass incarceration and disproportionately criminalizing Black and Latino individuals. It also abolished federal parole, increasing prison sentences and eliminating opportunities for rehabilitation.
● 1984: Expansion of Civil Asset Forfeiture Laws allowed law enforcement to seize property from individuals merely suspected of drug offenses, often without due process, leading to widespread racial profiling and financial devastation for Black and Latino communities.
● Late 1980s: Bush Administration Expansion of the War on Drugs further militarized policing, increased mandatory minimum sentences, and disproportionately incarcerated Black and Brown individuals for nonviolent drug offenses.
The legal and policy advancements of the 1970s and 1980s strengthened workplace protections and positioned DEI as a business imperative, with rulings like Griggs v. Duke Power Co. ensuring policies were evaluated by their impact, not just intent. However, opposition through the War on Drugs and tough-on-crime policies disproportionately criminalized communities of color, reinforcing systemic barriers to racial equity and widening disparities that DEI efforts continue to address today.
The 1990s expanded DEI beyond race and gender, as laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Civil Rights Act of 1991 strengthened workplace protections while corporate accountability efforts, such as the Texaco lawsuit, exposed systemic racism. However, this era also saw legal and political challenges to affirmative action and race-conscious policies, reflecting a growing backlash against DEI efforts in both government and business sectors.
● 1990: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted, protecting individuals with disabilities from discrimination in employment, public accommodations, and transportation.
● 1991: The Civil Rights Act of 1991 strengthened Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by allowing employees to seek compensatory and punitive damages for workplace discrimination.
● 1995: The rise of Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) in corporate settings fostered belonging, mentorship, and professional development for underrepresented groups.
● 1996: The Texaco discrimination lawsuit exposed systemic racial discrimination, leading to a $176 million settlement—the largest of its kind at the time—and mandated corporate diversity reforms.
● 1997: President Bill Clinton’s “One America Initiative” became the first-ever White House initiative on race, promoting national conversations on racial equity and encouraging corporate DEI strategies.
● 1995: Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña significantly limited federal affirmative action policies, ruling that race-based government programs must meet “strict scrutiny” and demonstrate a compelling government interest.
● 1996: Proposition 209 (California) banned affirmative action in public employment, education, and contracting, setting a precedent for similar anti-affirmative action measures in other states.
● 1998: Hopwood v. Texas struck down race-based admissions policies at the University of Texas Law School, accelerating the rollback of race-conscious admissions across higher education.
● Late 1990s: Anti-DEI Business Pushback saw corporate resistance to diversity initiatives, with some companies cutting affirmative action programs in response to legal challenges and political pressure.
The 1990s expanded workplace protections and corporate accountability, as the ADA improved disability inclusivity, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 empowered employees to challenge discrimination, and the Texaco lawsuit exposed the costs of ignoring DEI. However, legal rulings like Adarand v. Peña, California’s Proposition 209, and growing corporate resistance to affirmative action reflected an intensifying backlash against race-conscious policies, a trend that continues to shape DEI efforts today.
The 2000s and 2010s marked a shift toward data-driven DEI strategies, with research reinforcing the business case for diversity and advocacy efforts institutionalizing workplace inclusion. However, this period also saw significant legal and political challenges to civil rights, as court rulings and legislative actions weakened affirmative action, voter protections, and corporate diversity commitments.
● 2004: Formation of the National Diversity Council formalized advocacy for inclusive workplace cultures, emphasizing the systemic value of intersectionality in DEI initiatives.
● 2014: McKinsey’s Women in the Workplace report revealed a strong correlation between gender diversity and profitability, reinforcing the business case for equity initiatives.
● 2015: Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, strengthening legal protections for LGBTQ+ employees and reinforcing workplace inclusion efforts.
● 2016: The CEO Action for Diversity & Inclusion pledge united corporate leaders in advancing DEI strategies and committing to measurable change.
● 2017: The #MeToo Movement exposed systemic sexual harassment in workplaces, prompting companies to reevaluate workplace culture, strengthen policies, and promote gender equity at all levels.
● 2019: The CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair) was introduced to combat race-based hair discrimination, particularly against Black employees in schools and workplaces.
● 2010: Citizens United v. FEC allowed unlimited corporate spending in elections, increasing the influence of anti-DEI lobbying efforts that sought to dismantle workplace diversity initiatives.
● 2013: Shelby County v. Holder weakened the Voting Rights Act by removing federal oversight of state voting laws, leading to widespread voter suppression efforts that disproportionately disenfranchised communities of color and weakened support for DEI policies in education and employment.
● 2014–2016: Anti-Affirmative Action Lawsuits targeting university admissions, particularly against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, intensified efforts to dismantle race-conscious policies in education and employment.
● 2017: Corporate DEI Rollbacks saw increased resistance to affirmative action in hiring, as some executives and policymakers challenged diversity commitments in the wake of conservative political gains.
The 2000s and 2010s cemented DEI as a business priority, as research and advocacy reinforced corporate accountability and legal protections expanded in areas like LGBTQ+ rights and workplace equity. However, opposition through court rulings, anti-affirmative action efforts, and voter suppression laws undermined civil rights protections, setting the stage for continued challenges to DEI in the next decade.
The 2020s saw a major shift in DEI, as George Floyd’s murder in 2020 spurred global calls for racial equity, prompting corporations to implement anti-racism training, equitable hiring, and transparency measures. However, a growing political and legal backlash—fueled by conservative activists, Supreme Court decisions, executive orders, and corporate retrenchment—led to significant rollbacks in affirmative action, federal diversity programs, racial equity programs, and workplace equity initiatives.
● 2020: The murder of George Floyd ignited global movements for racial equity, prompting corporations and organizations to reassess their DEI commitments and invest in anti-racism training, racial equity initiatives, equitable hiring, and accountability measures.
● 2021: President Biden’s Executive Order on Advancing Racial Equity directed federal agencies to integrate equity into operations, emphasizing DEI as a public-sector priority.
● 2023: Pay transparency laws in states such as California and New York required employers to disclose salary ranges, address wage gaps and reinforce DEI principles in compensation equity.
● 2020: Executive Order 13950 – Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping prohibited federal agencies and contractors from conducting DEI-related training that included “race or sex stereotyping,” creating a chilling effect on workplace equity efforts.
● 2021: A growing movement of book bans begins to spread across the country, with PEN America documenting over 10,000 instances of book bans during the 2023-24 school year, with most of the books featuring people and characters of color and books with LGBTQ+ people and characters.
● 2023: Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard Supreme Court decision struck down race-conscious admissions, significantly hindering diversity efforts in higher education and limiting opportunities for underrepresented groups.
● 2025: Donald Trump Executive Order 14148 – “Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions” rescinded multiple executive orders from the previous administration that promoted DEI policies, effectively dismantling various DEI initiatives within federal agencies.
● 2025: Donald Trump Executive Order 14151 – “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing” directed the termination of all DEI-related policies, programs, and positions within federal agencies, requiring agencies to report employees involved in diversity and environmental justice work.
● 2025: Donald Trump Executive Order 14173 – “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity” prohibited private organizations from conducting DEI employment programs for jobs created by federal contracts, effectively banning affirmative action in federal contracting.
The 2020s brought both progress and setbacks in DEI, as corporate and governmental commitments to racial equity increased following George Floyd’s murder, leading to new investments in pay transparency and inclusive hiring. However, the dismantling of affirmative action, federal DEI programs, and race conscious policies signaled an intensifying backlash, reshaping the future of workplace diversity efforts and reigniting debates over the role of equity in public and private sectors.
The ongoing resistance to DEI initiatives reinforces the persistent need for racial equity, diversity, and systemic change, echoing a historical pattern of progress met with backlash. Understanding the history of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is essential for advancing racial equity in the face of ongoing resistance.
Rather than retreating, organizations must recognize that equity is not a trend but a necessity for long-term resilience, innovation, and justice. This timeline serves as a testament to DEI’s enduring relevance, proving that despite opposition, sustained commitment to racial equity remains essential for both societal progress and business success.
Judy Lubin
Dr. Judy is an applied sociologist, racial equity changemaker, yoga and mindfulness practitioner, author, auntie, bestie and beach lover. Judy’s elemental nature is water, and with her she brings calming, reflective energy to hold space for deep listening, inner work and transformative dialogue.
The curator of the Embodied Justice program, she hosts the accompanying podcast and co-facilitates events and dialogues focused on the collective healing and sustainability of Black changemakers.
At CURE, Dr. Judy has built transformative racial equity frameworks and change management processes that have impacted thousands of lives. She began her career focused on health disparities, recognizing that stress from societal racism can become embodied and manifested through “weathering” that prematurely ages the body and shortens the lifespan of racially marginalized communities.
She is unapologetically committed to centering Black people and the communities that have inspired her life’s work. The daughter of Haitian immigrants, she grew up in South Florida surrounded by music, her grandmother’s herbal garden, and the struggle to make it in a country that saw her family as outsiders.
In 2022, after experiencing multiple health emergencies coupled with burnout from the intensity of the “racial reckoning” that increased demand for CURE’s racial equity services, Judy began a process of listening to the wisdom of her body, healing old trauma wounds, and reclaiming rest and her love of mind-body healing. During this time she explored somatics, indigenous and and ancestral healing practices and earned certifications in multiple healing modalities including yoga and energy medicine.
Emerging from a place of rest and listening to what her soul wanted to share, she now weaves mindfulness, body-awareness and spiritual activism to support changemakers and organizations to regenerate their leadership and give to the world from a place of ease and wholeness.
Long committed to promoting women’s health and wellness, she is the author of The Heart of Living Well: Six Principles for a Life of Health, Beauty and Balance.
Find Judy on instagram or linkedin at @drjudylubin, where she (occasionally) shares posts celebrating Black joy, healing and well-being.
Shawn J. Moore
Residing at the intersection of leadership and mindfulness, Shawn creates sacred spaces for stillness and self-inquiry to help social impact leaders align their strengths, intention, and impact. Through his integrative approach, he holds transformative containers for self-renewal, personal discovery, and capacity-building that ease clients on their journey towards peace, clarity, and freedom.
Shawn is committed to empower changemakers to become embodied leaders – unified in mind, body, and heart – with the tools to mindfully pause, reconnect to their inner knowing, make strengths-driven decisions, and lead the change they believe the world needs.
Reckoning with his own contemplation of burnout, purpose, and alignment, Shawn transitioned out of his role as Associate Dean of Student Life & Leadership at Morehouse College in the fall of 2021 to focus more on mindfulness and stillness-based training programs and workshops.
While leadership resonates with him deeply, it is his personal and spiritual practices that allows him to continue to show up for himself and others. He is a yoga teacher (E-RYT® 200, RYT® 500, YACEP®), sound and reiki practitioner, meditation teacher, Yoga Nidra facilitator, and Gallup-Certified Strengths Coach, all focused through a Buddhist lens and 17 years of personal practice. He has contributed workshops, practices, and educational opportunities for celebrities like Questlove and Dyllón Burnside, and various yoga studios and colleges, Yoga International, Omstars, Melanin Moves Project, the Human Rights Campaign, Spotify and Lululemon. He currently serves as the Facilitation and Community Manager for BEAM (Black Emotional & Mental Health Collective).
Shawn hosts a podcast called The Mindful Rebel® Podcast that creates a platform to continually explore this unique intersection of leadership and mindfulness. Find him on instagram @shawnj_moore
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and to provide a better browsing experience.
